-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adr/network reliability #1082
Adr/network reliability #1082
Conversation
7261abd
to
9eafd94
Compare
Transactions CostsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
Cost of Init Transaction
Cost of Commit TransactionThis is using ada-only outputs for better comparability.
Cost of CollectCom Transaction
Cost of Close Transaction
Cost of Contest Transaction
Cost of Abort TransactionSome variation because of random mixture of still initial and already committed outputs.
Cost of FanOut TransactionInvolves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
End-To-End Benchmark ResultsThis page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmarks results produced by Hydra's Continuous Integration system from the latest Please take those results with a grain of salt as they are currently produced from very limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Instead of focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, eg. how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes. Generated at 2023-09-26 09:43:12.128619448 UTC 3-nodes ScenarioA rather typical setup, with 3 nodes forming a Hydra head.
Baseline ScenarioThis scenario represents a minimal case and as such is a good baseline against which to assess the overhead introduced by more complex setups. There is a single hydra-node d with a single client submitting single input and single output transactions with a constant UTxO set of 1.
|
9eafd94
to
efee7af
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
efee7af
to
c044c26
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the context section as it gives a good introduction. In my opinion, to approve and merge this, only a few more clarifications are needed (see below). None of them are show-stoppers though.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Nagel <ch1bo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Nagel <ch1bo@users.noreply.github.com>
This seems an implementation detail
4f9a84a
to
17c0a24
Compare
This ADR describes assumptions and responsibilities of the networking layer to ensure reliability. See #188